There were many suspects in the ‘Jack the Ripper’ murders over the
years. What is the evidence that supports the claim that James Kelly was ‘Jack the
Ripper’? If you are the rival detective, how do you eliminate all the evidence
that you have identified in the documentary?
The evidence
that supports the claim that James Kelly was ‘Jack the Ripper’ is he had
murdered his wife in 1883 by stabbing her in the neck. However, James Kelly was
not the real ‘Jack the Ripper’ as his last name same as Mary Kelly and had no
relation towards her. In the “Jack the Ripper in America”, the detective Ed
Norris said that James Kelly worked as a furniture upholsterer and this can be
argue as a carpenter didn’t know how to operate human body too fast and they
only know how to make furniture. A carpenter also didn’t know where those
organs he could get when he operated the human body. James Kelly also changed
his name to John Miller when he arrived at New York and we can’t recognize
James Kelly if he used that name in that country as there were lots of named
‘John Miller’. Other than that, James Kelly was not ‘Jack the Ripper’ as Kelly
was not the real murderer.
i totally agree with u as u said James Kelly is not the real of Jack the Ripper as there's no concrete evidence that lead him as real JTR.
ReplyDeletei'm also agree with both of u. yes, james kelly was not the JTR.
ReplyDelete